Contact Us 617-367-0077

Blog

Boston Federal Judge Says Law Limits When Immigrants Can Be Arrested

Posted by Todd Pomerleau | Jun 13, 2018 | 0 Comments

A federal judge in Boston on Monday invoked the Declaration of Independence in a formal order to release two Brazilian nationals who had entered the United States illegally.

“This country was born with a declaration of universal human rights,” Judge Mark Wolf wrote to begin his 62-page opinion, “proclaiming that: ‘all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights,' and that ‘among these' is ‘Liberty.' ”

Most Viewed Stories
Morphine Sulfate, OxyContin and Opana are displayed for a photograph in Carmichael, California, on Jan. 18, 2013. (Rich Pedroncelli/AP)
Mass. Sues Purdue Pharma Over 670 Residents Who Fatally Overdosed On Opioids
CommonHealthJun 12, 2018
This Local Nonprofit Finds Foster Homes For Pets When Their Humans Need Help
Play
WBUR News02:56Jun 12, 2018
Calling For Higher Minimum Wage, Anti-Poverty Protesters Block Traffic In Downtown Boston
WBUR NewsJun 11, 2018
3 Editors Resign Over Boston Review's Decision To Retain Author Junot Díaz
The ARTeryJun 11, 2018
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement had already released the two Brazilians, Lucimar De Souza and Eduardo Junqueira, after Wolf allowed them to appear in court demanding that ICE justify their continued detention.

Both had been arrested earlier this year at interviews with immigration officials to determine if their respective marriages to U.S. citizens were legitimate.

But in his lengthy order to release them, Wolf argued that ICE failed to follow its procedures and to provide De Souza and Junqueira with due process.

Wolf wrote that his reading of federal law finds that ICE can detain people in the country unlawfully only within 90 days of a formal order to remove them from the country. In recent years, ICE has kept detainees, including De Souza and Junqueira, for 90 days or more, even when formal orders for their removal from the country occurred years ago.

The opinion does not carry the force of law, but it could influence other cases and guide ICE in future arrests.

“The decision really confirms that ICE has an obligation to follow the law, that ICE had been systemically violating that obligation,” said Adriana Lafaille, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, which is representing De Souza.

“The language in this decision clearly requires ICE to, in my opinion, revisit their approach to detaining people years after the fact, to detaining people who pose no flight risk and have numerous ties to the community and who are clearly not dangerous people at all,” said Jeffrey Rubin, one of Junqueira's attorneys.

Last month, Wolf held two unusual days of hearings at Boston federal court, where he summoned immigration officials to testify.

In his order, Wolf did not address whether the arrests of immigrants at marriage interviews is legal.

He said that concern may soon be addressed in a class-action suit filed by the ACLU. Wolf will also decide that case.

A spokeswoman for the U.S. Department of Justice says it is still reviewing the order. A spokesman for ICE says it too is reviewing the decision.

This segment aired on June 12, 2018.

Source URL: WBUR News

About the Author

Todd Pomerleau

Attorney Pomerleau has a wealth of successful courtroom experience. A member of the Massachusetts and Maine bars, the Federal District Court of Massachusetts, and the First Circuit Court of Appeals, his practice focuses on all aspects of criminal defense. He also handles...

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today

We'll gladly discuss your case with you at your convenience. Contact us today to schedule an appointment.

[email protected]

Rubin | Pomerleau PC
Mon: 08:30am - 05:00pm
Tue: 08:30am - 05:00pm
Wed: 08:30am - 05:00pm
Thu: 08:30am - 05:00pm
Fri: 08:30am - 05:00pm

The information on this website may be considered advertising under the Massachusetts rules of professional conduct. The information you obtain at this website is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. The content is provided for informational purposes only. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us. However, contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Also, please do not send any confidential information to us, until an attorney-client relationship is established.

Menu